Try to weasel out of my current triple filtering, you TWIT!!!
Nothing has come through since I implemented level 3
filtering late this
morning, PDT.
Have a NICE life, troll!
dave
29
May
Ha! Got you NOW, Mack Attack!
posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (23)
23 Responses to “Ha! Got you NOW, Mack Attack!”
You know, we have been reading your tripe for too long. We shouldn’t have to
filter, or other things. You haven’t had a death notice read to you, as some of
us have, and you are spending your time criticizing others on here, at the
expense of the diabetic. Why don’t you take your threads and vanish.
Diabetics, as well as other ill people would certainly enjoy it.
On Mon, 24 May 2004 21:25:01 GMT, Bay Area Dave <da…@nospam.com> wrote:
> Try to weasel out of my current triple filtering, you TWIT!!!
> Nothing has come through since I implemented level 3
>filtering late this
> morning, PDT.
> Have a NICE life, troll!
> dave
Grateful to be back.
Eddie MD OTF
Bay Area Dave wrote:
> Try to weasel out of my current triple filtering, you TWIT!!!
> Nothing has come through since I implemented level 3 filtering late this
> morning, PDT.
> Have a NICE life, troll!
> dave
Dave,
It is obvious to all of us that there is bad blood between you and Mack,
but is it really necessary for you to project it all over the place like
this? I spend time in here looking for good solid advice for how to
handle my diabetes, and have seen the occasional good post from both you
-and- Mack.
I don’t know that it would make any difference here, but please consider
that these posts reflect worse on you than they do on Mack. I know that
you have positive things to add to the board here, but I can’t help but
cringe when I see this blatant negativity. It’s to the point where
whenever I see your name in the header I wonder whether it’s a useful
post or just more flame.
If there is something specific in a post that you feel is incorrect,
then it makes perfect sense to post a refuting position. That is what
makes this group what it is: the free exchange of advice and information.
Please, Dave, can’t you just let the negativity go?
Peace
"Bay Area Dave" <da…@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:NKtsc.56575$g47.43790@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com…
> Try to weasel out of my current triple filtering, you TWIT!!!
You’re a sad bugger Dave.
> Nothing has come through since I implemented level 3
> filtering late this
> morning, PDT.
Moving to DEFCON 4 next?
> Have a NICE life, troll!
Pot, kettle????
Beav
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
On Mon, 24 May 2004 15:46:18 -0700, southpaw <nob…@dev.null> wrote:
>Dave,
>It is obvious to all of us that there is bad blood between you and Mack,
>but is it really necessary for you to project it all over the place like
>this? I spend time in here looking for good solid advice for how to
>handle my diabetes, and have seen the occasional good post from both you
>-and- Mack.
>I don’t know that it would make any difference here, but please consider
>that these posts reflect worse on you than they do on Mack. I know that
>you have positive things to add to the board here, but I can’t help but
>cringe when I see this blatant negativity. It’s to the point where
>whenever I see your name in the header I wonder whether it’s a useful
>post or just more flame.
>If there is something specific in a post that you feel is incorrect,
>then it makes perfect sense to post a refuting position. That is what
>makes this group what it is: the free exchange of advice and information.
>Please, Dave, can’t you just let the negativity go?
>Peace
Amen
Cheers, Alan
—
if you don’t like a thread why don’t you just IGNORE IT, you
TWIT!
dave
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Simm Webb wrote:
can’t you ignore a thread when the title makes it obvious
what the subject matter is????
dave
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
southpaw wrote:
bite me!
dave
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Alan wrote:
learn to ignore threads you don’t approve up, you TWIT.
better yet, PLONK ME! then you won’t be tempted.
dave
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Beav wrote:
> "Bay Area Dave" <da…@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:NKtsc.56575$g47.43790@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com…
>> Try to weasel out of my current triple filtering, you TWIT!!!
> You’re a sad bugger Dave.
>> Nothing has come through since I implemented level 3
>>filtering late this
>> morning, PDT.
> Moving to DEFCON 4 next?
>> Have a NICE life, troll!
> Pot, kettle????
> Beav
On Tue, 25 May 2004 02:34:52 GMT, Bay Area Dave <da…@nospam.com>
wrote:
>bite me!
>dave
I really do regret this.
My first, and hopefully only, true diabetic poster killfile.
Bye Dave.
Cheers, Alan, T2 d&e, Australia.
Remove weight and carbs to email.
—
Everything in Moderation – Except Laughter.
it’s ABOUT TIME!!! thank you [wiping brow; getting SOME
miscreants to plonk me is HARD work!]
dave
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Alan wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2004 02:34:52 GMT, Bay Area Dave <da…@nospam.com>
> wrote:
>>bite me!
>>dave
> I really do regret this.
> My first, and hopefully only, true diabetic poster killfile.
> Bye Dave.
> Cheers, Alan, T2 d&e, Australia.
> Remove weight and carbs to email.
Bay Area Dave wrote:
> Try to weasel out of my current triple filtering, you TWIT!!!
> Nothing has come through since I implemented level 3
> filtering late this
> morning, PDT.
> Have a NICE life, troll!
I find it interesting that Mack hasn’t bothered with this thread.
So it’s just Dave shadow-boxing the real twit in the mirror.
I wonder how long before he plonks himself. Soon I hope,
—
Jim Dumas
T1 4/86, background retinopathy, rarely hypoglycemic: <1/mo.
lispro+R+U+NPH daily, moderate exercise, typically <6% HbA1c
Bay Area Dave wrote:
> can’t you ignore a thread when the title makes it obvious what the
> subject matter is????
> dave
I think it’s a shame that you have let yourself fall victim to this kind
of childishness, Dave. I used to think that you were one of the better
posters in this group. I especially liked your having shared your
experiences with your pump. As a pumper myself, I value that kind of
anecdotal information.
But I don’t think I can read your posts anymore without thinking about
this kind of negativity. I have a hard enough time dealing with the crap
around me in real life and I really would rather not have to deal with
it in here. I have no trouble putting your typical spammer or crackpot
in my killfile, but I would have hoped to have been able to avoid
putting you there.
Of course, your behavior is entirely up to you. If you want to portray
yourself in this light among your peers in this group, that is your
right. But I would hope that someday you’d find that broadcasting such
negativity is needless and ultimately fruitless.
Peace
Hairy Antelope wrote:
> For heavens sake Dave, this is getting childish in the extreme, and
> now does nothing except display a side of you that most people would
> prefer not to see ….
And wouldn’t if the otherwise reasonable folks
would stop quoting it.
–
Wes Groleau
——
"The reason most women would rather have beauty than brains is
they know that most men can see better than they can think."
— James Dobson
On Tue, 25 May 2004 02:32:59 GMT, Bay Area Dave <da…@nospam.com> wrote:
>if you don’t like a thread why don’t you just IGNORE IT, you
>TWIT!
>dave
>Simm Webb wrote:
You know, we have been reading your tripe for too long. We shouldn’t have to
filter, or other things.
I don’t recall calling you names. I have diabetes, among other things, and
since this is a diabetic forum, I really should NOT have to ignore droppings
from the likes of you. After all, I didn’t spend money on a computer, and money
for the use of the Internet, to turn off my computer, or ignore the likes of
you. You impress me as one who pretends he is one of us, but is in reality,
just another sophomore getting his jollies.
Grateful to be back.
Eddie MD OTF
I hope someday you learn to ignore threads that rile you
up…instead of adding nothing of value and wasting your time.
dave
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
southpaw wrote:
> Bay Area Dave wrote:
>> can’t you ignore a thread when the title makes it obvious what the
>> subject matter is????
>> dave
> I think it’s a shame that you have let yourself fall victim to this kind
> of childishness, Dave. I used to think that you were one of the better
> posters in this group. I especially liked your having shared your
> experiences with your pump. As a pumper myself, I value that kind of
> anecdotal information.
> But I don’t think I can read your posts anymore without thinking about
> this kind of negativity. I have a hard enough time dealing with the crap
> around me in real life and I really would rather not have to deal with
> it in here. I have no trouble putting your typical spammer or crackpot
> in my killfile, but I would have hoped to have been able to avoid
> putting you there.
> Of course, your behavior is entirely up to you. If you want to portray
> yourself in this light among your peers in this group, that is your
> right. But I would hope that someday you’d find that broadcasting such
> negativity is needless and ultimately fruitless.
> Peace
Calling you a "twit" was mild and appropriate. You must not
get around usenet much if you think that is a big deal.
Secondly, writing things like "tripe" was inflammatory; you
got less than what you deserve in my response, so quit
whining like a little girl. sheesh!
dave
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Simm Webb wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2004 02:32:59 GMT, Bay Area Dave <da…@nospam.com> wrote:
>>if you don’t like a thread why don’t you just IGNORE IT, you
>>TWIT!
>>dave
>>Simm Webb wrote:
> You know, we have been reading your tripe for too long. We shouldn’t have to
> filter, or other things.
> I don’t recall calling you names. I have diabetes, among other things, and
> since this is a diabetic forum, I really should NOT have to ignore droppings
> from the likes of you. After all, I didn’t spend money on a computer, and money
> for the use of the Internet, to turn off my computer, or ignore the likes of
> you. You impress me as one who pretends he is one of us, but is in reality,
> just another sophomore getting his jollies.
> Grateful to be back.
> Eddie MD OTF
just let this thread die…
dave
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Hairy Antelope wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2004 12:10:32 -0500, you , Wes Groleau <groleau+n…@freeshell.org>, wrote:
>>And wouldn’t if the otherwise reasonable folks would stop quoting it.
> I suppose that’s true … I’ve been trying to pursuade Dave that it
> would be better if he cooled down a tad …. I’ve reached the point
> where I feel he’s a lost cause, and would be best ignored until he
> calms down …
> (Note to Dave: ignored, not plonked ….)
"Bay Area Dave" <da…@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:ghysc.72625$lb4.57025@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com…
> bite me!
You’re watching too much TV if all you can manage is a plagarism off Becker.
Beav
who is Becker??
dave
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Beav wrote:
> "Bay Area Dave" <da…@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:ghysc.72625$lb4.57025@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com…
>>bite me!
> You’re watching too much TV if all you can manage is a plagarism off Becker.
> Beav
"Bay Area Dave" <da…@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:PcIuc.62291$dT4.14281@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com…
> who is Becker??
Where d’you think "Bite me" came from?
Beav
i’ll grant you that it might have come from "Becker"; BUT
who the heck IS Becker? Is that a show that Ted Dansen was
on? I never saw it.
dave
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Beav wrote:
> "Bay Area Dave" <da…@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:PcIuc.62291$dT4.14281@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com…
>>who is Becker??
> Where d’you think "Bite me" came from?
> Beav
It was a popular saying when I was a kid, a long time ago, and long
before Becker.
–
Cheri
Type 2, no meds for now.
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
>"Bay Area Dave" <da…@nospam.com> wrote in message
>news:PcIuc.62291$dT4.14281@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com…
>> who is Becker??
Beav wrote in message <10bq5gb1hgp…@news.supernews.com>…
>Where d’you think "Bite me" came from?
>Beav
"Bay Area Dave" <da…@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:EOavc.77535$%P.65791@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com…
> i’ll grant you that it might have come from "Becker"; BUT
> who the heck IS Becker? Is that a show that Ted Dansen was
> on? I never saw it.
I never saw it either, but I DID see the ads. Yeah, it’s Ted Dansen and it
looked so poor when compared to Cheers, I gave it a miss.
Beav