I have received a lot of e-mail from folks telling me that there’s no such
thing as being a "borderline diabetic," or having "diabetic
tendencies," that, in the words of one of my correspondents, it’s like
being "a little pregnant." The reasons given for this make sense to me,
but I have a question. My doctor told me that my BG levels are withing
normal levels until I have an intake of sugars (e.g. at a meal), then it
temporarily jumps into the diabetic range, and eventually falls back to
within normal. He called this being "glucose intolerant."
The question is: Is this any different than what I first described? Is
"glucose intolerant" a legitimate category? He told me that it means I’ll
almost certainly develop into full diabetes, and it’s just a matter of how
long I can delay this through diet and exercise. This also makes sense to
me, as much as the above does.
My take on this is that the net result is that I have to modify my diet and
begin an exercise program of some kind, so either way I wind up doing the
same thing. The only difference is when I start on meds. OTOH, I’m new to
this, so what the hell do I know? :-)
Any views on this will be greatly appreciated. Please post instead of
e-mailing, because I think this might be a valuable discussion for others
who are just beginning like I am.
Thanx,
Alf
–
Alf the Poet <a…@epix.net>
http://www.epix.net/~alf/
PGP key fingerprint: 65 28 FE C8 67 B0 4E 9E 2B 7B 80 20 E5 AD CE AB
posted by admin in Uncategorized and have
Comments (3)